The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States protects freedom of speech, stating, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The First Amendment provides all American citizens the right to express opinions without fear of repercussion or consequence from the government, though there are certain limits to this inalienable right we share as American citizens.
In many instances, it is easy to discern what constitutes “speech” for purposes of the First Amendment. The word “speech,” as used in the First Amendment, includes much more than spoken words. For example, an armband can constitute speech, as can a billboard, a book, an article, a painting, a prayer, a statement (even if it is vulgar) sewn or drawn on clothing, a movie, or music. Determining what is protected speech under the First Amendment can sometimes be difficult, but that should never discourage you from pursuing and protecting your rights. The Law Offices of George M. Sanders has significant experience in these and other civil rights-related cases. To discuss whether your free speech rights were violated, we encourage you to seek help from our experienced Chicago freedom of speech attorney.
Your right to speak freely is one of the most protected and most contested rights under the Constitution. At The Law Offices of George M. Sanders, we can help if:
We can evaluate these and many other speech-related claims to help you understand the possible paths forward to defend your rights.
The First Amendment does not explain precisely what freedom of speech means. Over the years, the courts have had to grapple with what constitutes “speech.” For example, while a painting can constitute speech, what about a specially prepared and designed cake? What about wedding photos taken by a professional photographer? The courts are ultimately responsible for determining what is and is not speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment.
Just as the Constitution protects your right to speak your mind, the First Amendment also prevents the government from forcing you to say things you do not agree with. In West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, the Supreme Court was asked to determine if forcing schoolchildren to salute the American flag violated free speech protections. The Supreme Court ruled that it did, which overturned a previous decision (Minersville School District v. Gobitis). The issue of forced or compelled speech can arise in many different contexts. For example, an issue that is arising more frequently today is when a government entity (a school, public employer, etc.) compels an employee, teacher, or student to use the preferred pronouns of another person. Another area in which this issue comes up is when public schools or public universities, for example, require employees to sign and/or repeat a diversity pledge.
A growing issue in First Amendment law is the tension between freedom of speech and antidiscrimination and anti-harassment laws and policies. In Sax v. State College Area School District, the Third Circuit held that the state college’s anti-harassment policy was too broadly drafted and would have censored and/or deterred broad categories of speech. The Third Circuit pointed out that the college could not prohibit speech simply by branding it harassment. Further, the Third Circuit stated: “That speech about ‘values’ may offend is not cause for its prohibition, but the reason for its protection . . .” The upshot of cases such as Sax is that governments and state actors need to carefully define and limit words like harassment in order to avoid infringing First Amendment interests.
Here are a few examples of cases involving both direct and symbolic forms of speech that the Supreme Court has held are entitled to protection.
There are limits, however, on the types of speech protected by the First Amendment. For example, the First Amendment does not protect:
If your right to speak, write, or express yourself has been unlawfully silenced, you need an advocate who knows how to fight for you. The Law Offices of George M. Sanders stands out for our:
If you find yourself in a situation where you believe your First Amendment Rights are being violated or may have been violated, you should contact a reputable attorney to discuss your circumstances and learn about your legal options. Our law firm represents clients in Illinois communities throughout Cook County, Will County, Grundy County, DuPage County, Lake County, McHenry County, and Kane County. Call The Law Offices of George M. Sanders today to schedule an appointment.